A practical study guide to analysing how people practices can support an organisation in achieving its carbon net zero goal.
AC 3.2 asks learners to analyse how people practices could help the case-study organisation achieve its goal to be carbon net zero by 2036.
The key command word is analyse. This requires showing relationships between people practices, employee capability or behaviour, and progress towards the organisational goal. A list of HR activities is not enough.
A carbon net zero transition may involve new technology, changed processes, different skills and new expectations about how work is performed. Although environmental targets can involve engineering and operational decisions, employees ultimately implement many of the changes.
People practices can therefore support the transition by helping the organisation obtain relevant capability, develop employees, involve the workforce and align aspects of the employee experience with strategic priorities.
Resourcing practices can help an organisation identify and attract capabilities needed as work changes. A sustainability transition may create demand for technical, digital, engineering or other specialist skills that differ from existing requirements.
The analytical link is not simply that recruitment supports sustainability. Consider how access to relevant capability can enable changes in products, processes or operations that contribute to the carbon net zero strategy.
Existing employees may need opportunities to develop knowledge and skills as technologies and working methods change. Learning and development can support adaptation by helping employees understand new processes and build the capabilities required to perform changed roles.
In the case-study context, electric-vehicle development and manufacturing-plant upgrades provide relevant reasons to consider capability development. The strength of the analysis comes from connecting learning to changed work and then to the wider strategic objective.
Employees can hold practical knowledge about processes, inefficiencies and how proposed changes may affect day-to-day work. Consultation and other forms of employee voice can help organisations access this knowledge and identify implementation issues.
The case study states that the Evolve strategy was developed following extensive consultation with employees. This provides a direct link between employee involvement and the organisation’s sustainability strategy, while leaving scope to analyse how continued involvement could support implementation.
Performance-related people practices can help translate broad organisational priorities into clearer expectations about roles and contribution. Where appropriate, sustainability-related responsibilities can be incorporated into objectives, feedback and discussions about performance.
The important analytical question is how such alignment could influence behaviour and decision making. Avoid assuming that simply adding an environmental target to an objective will automatically change outcomes.
Reward and recognition can communicate what the organisation values. Recognition of useful sustainability ideas, collaboration or contributions to improved ways of working may reinforce desired behaviours.
However, incentives need careful design. Poorly selected measures can encourage employees to focus on a narrow target or produce unintended behaviours. Analysis should therefore consider the mechanism through which reward could support the goal rather than assuming financial incentives are always necessary or effective.
People practices can also influence whether sustainability becomes part of everyday organisational behaviour. Recruitment messages, learning, leadership expectations, employee involvement and recognition can collectively reinforce the importance of environmental responsibility.
This matters because a long-term target such as carbon net zero is unlikely to depend on one isolated HR initiative. Consistency across people practices can help connect the strategic ambition with routine decisions and ways of working.
Keep the analysis anchored to the case-study facts. Relevant details include the goal to be carbon net zero by 2036, the Evolve strategy, the organisation’s focus on sustainability, development of electric vehicles, planned manufacturing upgrades and the existing People Team specialisms.
The early careers programme is also described as part of the talent pipeline needed for the Evolve strategy. This creates another legitimate area for considering how talent-related people practices could support future capability. Do not invent environmental programmes, targets or HR initiatives that are not stated in the case.
A useful analytical chain is people practice → effect on capability, behaviour or employee involvement → effect on organisational activity → contribution to the carbon net zero goal.
For example, naming learning and development is descriptive. Explaining what capability is needed, how development could change employees’ ability to perform changed work, and why that supports the transition creates analysis.
Useful research areas include green human resource management, green skills, sustainability-oriented learning and development, employee involvement in environmental initiatives, sustainable performance management, green reward and recognition, organisational culture and environmental sustainability, and workforce capability during sustainability transitions.
Use credible academic and professional sources to develop your understanding before deciding independently which people practices provide the strongest basis for your assessment.
This resource explains concepts and an analytical approach relevant to AC 3.2. It is not a completed assessment response. Learners should complete their own independent work and follow the academic integrity and assessment requirements provided by CIPD and their Study Centre.
Return to the 5CO01 resource directory to explore all assessment criterion study guides.
Specialist support for CIPD Level 3, Level 5 and Level 7 learners, with guidance from HR professionals.
