A practical study guide to turning self-assessment into realistic, purposeful development activities for the next stage of your professional learning journey.
AC 3.3 turns the self-assessment from AC 3.2 into a forward-looking development plan. You need to identify at least two development activities that you will undertake or begin within the next six months, briefly explain what each activity involves and explain why you selected it.
The assessment guidance expects the activities to connect directly with development areas identified through your self-assessment. This makes AC 3.3 purposeful CPD planning rather than a general list of learning opportunities.
Continuing professional development, or CPD, is the ongoing process of maintaining and developing the knowledge, skills and behaviours needed for effective professional practice. It can involve formal learning, but professional development is much broader than attending courses.
Useful CPD begins with a learning need. The activity is then selected because it offers a realistic way of addressing that need or building further on an existing capability.
A common mistake in development planning is choosing an attractive course or webinar first and then trying to justify it afterwards. A stronger process begins with the gap or development priority identified in AC 3.2.
A useful sequence is development need → desired improvement → suitable activity → reason for choosing it. This creates a visible connection between self-awareness and action.
The assessment guidance warns against vague aspirations such as “read more books.” A development activity should be clear enough that another person could understand what you intend to do.
For example, rather than “improve data skills,” identify the learning activity you will undertake to improve those skills. The assessment does not require you to invent a course if you have not chosen one, but your planned action should still be concrete and realistic.
The guidance confirms that formal activities are acceptable. These could include a relevant course, qualification, structured workshop or CIPD webinar where it directly addresses the identified development need.
Formal learning can be particularly useful when you need structured knowledge, expert instruction or a clear progression through unfamiliar material. Its value depends on relevance rather than simply having a certificate at the end.
Informal development is equally valid. The guidance gives examples such as reading, mentoring and shadowing. Other workplace learning can also be useful where it provides genuine opportunities to develop the required capability.
For some behavioural skills, practical exposure and feedback may be more useful than classroom learning alone. The choice should therefore reflect the nature of the development need.
Mentoring can support development by giving you access to another person’s experience, challenge and perspective. It can be useful when the development need involves professional judgement, confidence, career direction or understanding how experienced practitioners approach complex situations.
A meaningful mentoring activity should have a purpose. Consider what you want to discuss, what capability you want to strengthen and how you will use what you learn.
Shadowing allows you to observe how another practitioner handles work that you have less experience of. It can be valuable for areas such as difficult conversations, stakeholder meetings, recruitment activity or other practical people-practice processes.
Observation alone is not enough. Development becomes stronger when you reflect afterwards on what you noticed, why particular approaches were effective and what you could apply to your own practice.
Reading can be effective CPD when it is focused on a defined need. Rather than planning to “read more,” identify a particular subject area, professional resource or body of material and what you intend to learn from it.
Reading is especially useful when combined with application. Consider how new knowledge will influence a decision, behaviour or way of working rather than treating completion of the reading as the development outcome.
Webinars and workshops can provide concentrated learning on a particular professional topic and expose you to current practice or different perspectives. They can be suitable for knowledge gaps identified during self-assessment.
The development value increases when you capture key learning afterwards and identify how it relates to your own work. Attendance by itself does not demonstrate that capability has improved.
Different development needs require different learning methods. A knowledge gap may respond well to structured reading or a course. A behavioural skill such as conflict handling may benefit more from observation, practice, coaching and feedback.
This is why the reason for choosing an activity matters. The activity should make sense as a response to the specific development need.
The assessment guidance explicitly requires the CPD choices to link with the development areas identified in AC 3.2. If your self-assessment identified limited confidence with workforce analytics, for example, an activity focused on developing relevant data capability would create a logical progression.
If the activity addresses something that never appeared in your self-assessment, the development plan may appear disconnected from the reflection that came before it.
Professional development does not have to focus only on weaknesses. The guidance allows learners to consider how an activity may build on an existing strength.
For example, someone who already communicates effectively in small groups may choose an activity that extends this capability into facilitation or presenting to larger audiences. The reason should still connect clearly with professional development needs or goals.
The activities must be planned for the next six months. They can be completed during that period or commenced within it, depending on the nature of the activity.
This timeframe encourages realistic planning. A development goal that is too broad or distant may be difficult to translate into meaningful action, while a six-month horizon allows you to identify practical next steps.
AC 3.3 is forward-looking. Activities you have already completed do not belong here simply because they were valuable.
The next criterion, AC 3.4, specifically addresses development activities undertaken previously. Keeping the two separate helps distinguish planned learning from reflection on past learning.
The official guidance requires a brief explanation of each activity. This should make clear what you will actually do rather than simply naming a learning category.
For example, if mentoring is selected, explain the intended mentoring arrangement or focus. If a webinar or course is selected, identify the area of learning and how you expect to engage with it.
The rationale is just as important as the activity itself. Explain why this particular form of development is appropriate for the need identified in AC 3.2.
A strong rationale might consider relevance, opportunity for practice, access to expertise, suitability to the type of skill being developed or how the activity will help close a specific capability gap.
Although the brief does not require a complex development-plan template, it is useful to know what improvement you are seeking. An activity is a means; the intended change in capability is the outcome.
Ask yourself: What should I be better able to understand, do or demonstrate after this activity? This keeps CPD focused on professional growth rather than completion.
For each activity, you can think through four questions:
This is a thinking framework rather than a mandatory assessment format.
Purposeful CPD does not require an ambitious list of activities. Two well-chosen and realistic activities can demonstrate stronger professional judgement than a long list that is unlikely to be completed.
Consider practical factors such as time, access and relevance. The plan should represent development you could genuinely undertake rather than an idealised learning programme.
A strong response identifies at least two specific future development activities, clearly links them to the self-assessment, explains what each activity involves and provides a convincing reason for choosing it.
The activities can be formal, informal or a combination. What matters is that the plan is realistic, purposeful and connected to the learner’s actual professional development needs.
This resource explains how to turn self-assessment into purposeful professional development. It does not prescribe which activities you personally should select. Your AC 3.3 choices need to follow logically from your own strengths, weaknesses and development areas from AC 3.2 and represent activities you genuinely intend to undertake or commence within the next six months.
Continue through the individual 5CO03 assessment criterion study guides.
Specialist support for CIPD Level 3, Level 5 and Level 7 learners, with guidance from HR professionals.
